Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive statistics of the changes in the rate of canine movement over time in the experimental side for each group as well as the results of significance tests using repeated measures ANOVA and its post-hoc tests

From: Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial

Time

Comparisons

Piezocision group

Laser-assisted flapless corticotomy group

Mean Diff.

P-Value*

95% CI

Mean Diff.

P-Value*

95% CI

Lower bound

Upper bound

Lower bound

Upper bound

T1

T1-T2

0.21

0.013

0.06

0.35

0.46

0.062

−0.03

0.96

T1-T3

0.41

0.045

0.01

0.81

0.74

0.023

0.16

1.31

T1-T4

0.63

0.001

0.37

0.89

0.74

0.012

0.27

1.22

T2

T2-T3

0.20

0.141

−0.16

0.56

0.27

0.275

− 0.33

0.88

T2-T4

0.42

0.057

0.28

0.57

0.28

0.065

−0.02

0.59

T3

T3-T4

0.22

0.107

−0.05

0.49

0.00

0.969

−0.39

0.40

  1. *Significant at P < 0.05, Least Significant Difference (LSD) post-hoc tests were employed, Mean Diff mean difference, CI confidence interval